Peer Review Process
IJEIDM follows a rigorous double-blind peer-review process to ensure academic integrity, originality, and research quality. All submissions are screened for plagiarism and ethical compliance. The journal adheres to internationally accepted publication ethics and best practices.
Review Workflow
| 1. Initial Screening | The editorial team checks the manuscript for scope, format, and plagiarism. |
| 2. Reviewer Assignment | Suitable subject experts are assigned to review the manuscript anonymously. |
| 3. Double-Blind Review | Reviewer and author identities are kept confidential to ensure unbiased evaluation. |
| 4. Review Decision | Based on reviewers' comments,
the editor may recommend: Acceptance / Minor Revision / Major Revision / Rejection |
| 5. Final Decision | The Editor-in-Chief makes the final publication decision. |